When the Hunter Became the Hunted
July 29, 2015
Wow! The wrath of the Internet has descended full-force on Walter Palmer, the Minnesota dentist who killed Cecil the Lion, a beloved inhabitant of Hwange National Park in Zimbabwe. Palmer and his guides lured Cecil from the preserve and wounded him with an arrow. The lion fled, and the hunters killed him two days later when they finally tracked him down. Then the hunters had their oops moment: they found a GPS collar on Cecil, and then they tried and failed to destroy it, suggesting they knew they done wrong.
Palmer, an experienced big game hunter (who’s also had previous run-ins with the law), does not deny killing Cecil. He released a statement saying he regrets killing the pride leader, not because he was a magnificent animal (which, one presumes, is exactly why Palmer wanted the lion’s head for a trophy), but because Cecil is a known and popular icon of the national park. I’m a live and let live gal, so I take a dim view of recreational hunting. Deer hunters get a pass (I too love venison), but there’s a world of difference between killing a deer to stock the freezer and beheading and skinning a lion, elephant, or rhinoceros to show off. I abhor what Palmer has done, and hope not only his safari guides (who have been arrested) but he himself will be prosecuted for his crime.
But this letter’s not about hunting.
It’s about the online reaction. Do not get me wrong: I share the outrage of the thousands (yes, THOU-SANDS) of people who have logged onto Yelp and left a negative review of Palmer’s dentistry practice. When the story first broke, I commented on a friend’s Facebook wall how people who want to kill lions should have to try doing it in an arena with a sword. Then I looked at those Yelp reviews and felt the sting of shame. The comments range from a satirical account of sitting in Palmer’s dentistry chair and having a filling go awry, to death threats. You cannot miss the virtual pitchfork waving on Facebook and Twitter, with lots of people calling for Palmer’s head—literally.
Doesn’t anyone else find this disturbing? Many friends feel that justice is being served, but can it be justice when it’s delivered by a mob? We’ve read story after story of people’s lives being ruined by Internet backlash, often for deeds far less heinous than Palmer’s. Justine Sacco tweeted a racist remark about AIDS in Africa (which she meant to be satirical). Alicia Ann Lynch posted a photo of herself dressed for Halloween as a Boston Marathon bombing victim. Both lost their jobs, not because of their poor judgment, but because of their Internet infamy. These women made foolish, perhaps even reprehensible, choices, but did they deserve to be fired? Did they deserve to be threatened with rape and death, and have their relatives threatened with the same? I think a sharply worded rebuke and disapproving glare were more commensurate with their actions. Not the everlasting Scarlet Letter that comes with Internet censure.
In real life, when the mob prevails, it burns innocents accused of witchcraft, guillotines children, imprisons poets, and slaughters ordinary people who happen to worship differently. I wrote this letter after watching online friends clap their hands in glee as the online backlash led Palmer to close his dentistry practice. Does he deserve to be pilloried? I might aim a rotten tomato at his nose while he stood in the stocks, if we had a real public square. I would support extraditing him to Zimbabwe to face prosecution for his crime (and let me reiterate—it was a crime). But I don’t think his children and the employees of his dental practice deserve to stand in the stocks alongside him, while the mob decides whether to carry out the death threats.
To read more letters, click on The Path!
Reblogged this on AM Justice Journeys Through Time and commented:
That Minnesota dentist who killed a beloved lion? He did a bad thing, but I can’t help but wonder if the Internet mob might be worse. See my One Year of Letters post for more on this topic.
Well thought out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
One action on Facebook leaves me shaken to the core; group leaders who destroy the soul of the innocent in their group. Many join the group, few see the evil face of their leader. The leader is a master of manipulation, words carefully chosen, enticing their prey to the dwelling of many rooms; even collecting money from members; promising actions which never attain fruition. This occurs at all hours, especially in the darkness of night. Once, I surrendered to the darkness of one leader, blindly observing only light. My eyes were opened. I saw too much darkness, I left, running as fast as I could; leaving his blind victims behind, lifting them up to the light.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for your reply, but we here at OYOL are wondering if this comment is on the correct post. We’re not sure how this relates to Cecil.
Thanks for reading though!
This post was not intended to be placed here, I apologize. Please remove it.
Well written and mature viewpoint. It is easy to pick apart others from the safety and privacy of our own homes. This reminds me a lot of internet bullying with teenagers where it’s easy to jump on the bandwagon ,throw spears, you don’t have to watch your target die from multiple spear wounds and you remain in the comfort of your own home. I agree what happened to Cecil was wrong on multiple levels but how does creating more harm in our universe make it any better?
I came upon this post this evening, surprised it had not been removed, I smiled. “Good,” I thought, in a strange way it is a metaphor. The evil leader does not kill lions; he kills people.
Pingback: The Paradox of Gun Nuts — Colleen – 8/14/2015 | One Year of Letters